Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIBPX vs RCWBX
FIBPX vs RCWBX Comparison
Open Charts FIBPX vs RCWBX
Federated Hermes Intl Bond Strategy
Price$13.03
Change+$0.09 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.73M
American Funds Capital World Bond R2
Price$16.22
Change+$0.16 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.97B
FIBPX vs RCWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIBPX vs. RCWBX commentary
Aug 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIBPX is a Hold and RCWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCWBX has more cash in the bank: 9.97B vs. FIBPX (81.7M). FIBPX pays higher dividends than RCWBX: FIBPX (5.01) vs RCWBX (2.78). FIBPX was incepted earlier than RCWBX: FIBPX (17 years) vs RCWBX (23 years). RCWBX (1.58) is less costly to investors than FIBPX (0.61). RCWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 251.00 vs. FIBPX (5.00). FIBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCWBX: FIBPX (0) vs RCWBX (250). FIBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.87 vs. RCWBX (3.84). FIBPX return over 5 years is better than : 1.64 vs. RCWBX (-15.90).
| FIBPX | RCWBX | FIBPX / RCWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.02 | 1.58 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.58 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.864 | 6.803 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.7M | 9.97B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.01 | 2.78 | 180% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.87 | 3.84 | 231% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.02 | 2.99 | 637% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.64 | -15.90 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.36 | -2.63 | -1,040% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement