Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIBPX vs RCWEX
FIBPX vs RCWEX Comparison
Open Charts FIBPX vs RCWEX
Federated Hermes Intl Bond Strategy
Price$13.07
Change+$0.04 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.73M
American Funds Capital World Bond R4
Price$16.47
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.97B
FIBPX vs RCWEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIBPX vs. RCWEX commentary
Aug 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIBPX is a Hold and RCWEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCWEX has more cash in the bank: 9.97B vs. FIBPX (81.7M). FIBPX pays higher dividends than RCWEX: FIBPX (5.01) vs RCWEX (3.48). FIBPX was incepted earlier than RCWEX: FIBPX (17 years) vs RCWEX (23 years). RCWEX (0.83) is less costly to investors than FIBPX (0.61). RCWEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 251.00 vs. FIBPX (5.00). FIBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCWEX: FIBPX (0) vs RCWEX (250). FIBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.10 vs. RCWEX (3.59). FIBPX return over 5 years is better than : 0.97 vs. RCWEX (-13.28).
| FIBPX | RCWEX | FIBPX / RCWEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.02 | 0.83 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.83 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.864 | 7.490 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.7M | 9.97B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.01 | 3.48 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.10 | 3.59 | 225% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.32 | 5.97 | 324% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.97 | -13.28 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.54 | 4.29 | 642% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement