Ad is loading...
FIBPX vs RCWHX
FIBPX vs RCWHX Comparison
Open Charts FIBPX vs RCWHX
Federated Hermes Intl Bond Strategy
Price$12.66
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets77.24M
American Funds Capital World Bond R5E
Price$16.23
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.93B
FIBPX vs RCWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIBPX vs. RCWHX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIBPX is a Hold and RCWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCWHX has more cash in the bank: 9.93B vs. FIBPX (77.2M). FIBPX pays higher dividends than RCWHX: FIBPX (5.10) vs RCWHX (3.40). FIBPX was incepted earlier than RCWHX: FIBPX (16 years) vs RCWHX (9 years). RCWHX (0.64) and FIBPX (0.61) have similar cost to investors . RCWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 251.00 vs. FIBPX (5.00). FIBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCWHX: FIBPX (0) vs RCWHX (250). FIBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.71 vs. RCWHX (5.53). FIBPX return over 5 years is better than : 7.89 vs. RCWHX (-7.97).
| FIBPX | RCWHX | FIBPX / RCWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.02 | 0.64 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.64 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.801 | 5.113 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 77.2M | 9.93B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.10 | 3.40 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.71 | 5.53 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.17 | 3.16 | 385% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.89 | -7.97 | -99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...