Ad is loading...
FICGX vs RGACX
FICGX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FICGX vs RGACX
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl A
Price$12.31
Change+$0.10 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$74.29
Change+$0.87 (+1.18%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FICGX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICGX vs. RGACX commentary
Dec 25, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICGX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 304B vs. FICGX (472M). RGACX pays higher dividends than FICGX: RGACX (0.25) vs FICGX (0.05). FICGX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FICGX (24 years) vs RGACX (23 years). FICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RGACX (31.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FICGX: RGACX (250) vs FICGX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.18 vs. FICGX (17.86). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 47.00 vs. FICGX (1.12).
| FICGX | RGACX | FICGX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.042 | 19.982 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 472M | 304B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.25 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.86 | 20.18 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.39 | 1.78 | -640% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.12 | 47.00 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.66 | 73.55 | 5% |