Ad is loading...
FICHX vs RGACX
FICHX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FICHX vs RGACX
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl Inst
Price$12.88
Change-$0.43 (-3.23%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$72.40
Change-$9.37 (-11.46%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FICHX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FICHX vs. RGACX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICHX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 313B vs. FICHX (480M). FICHX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FICHX (0.35) vs RGACX (0.25). FICHX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FICHX (12 years) vs RGACX (23 years). FICHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RGACX (31.00). FICHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FICHX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.84 vs. FICHX (20.59). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 53.77 vs. FICHX (8.19).
| FICHX | RGACX | FICHX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.013 | 33.524 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 480M | 313B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.25 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.59 | 34.84 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.84 | 17.52 | -33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.19 | 53.77 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.56 | 93.96 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...