Ad is loading...
FIDCX vs FRBAX
FIDCX vs FRBAX Comparison
Open Charts FIDCX vs FRBAX
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$14.23
Change-$0.95 (-6.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets370.9M
JHancock Regional Bank A
Price$24.54
Change-$2.48 (-9.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets804.86M
FIDCX vs FRBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIDCX vs. FRBAX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIDCX is a Buy and FRBAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRBAX has more cash in the bank: 805M vs. FIDCX (371M). FRBAX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: FRBAX (1.86) vs FIDCX (0.54). FIDCX was incepted earlier than FRBAX: FIDCX (26 years) vs FRBAX (33 years). FIDCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than FRBAX (1.27). FIDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FRBAX (3.00). FIDCX (1000) and FRBAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.75 vs. FIDCX (7.50). FRBAX return over 5 years is better than : 93.80 vs. FIDCX (38.67).
| FIDCX | FRBAX | FIDCX / FRBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.26 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.27 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.531 | -6.040 | 9% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 371M | 805M | 46% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 1.86 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.50 | 12.75 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.17 | -9.95 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.67 | 93.80 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.01 | 56.38 | -7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers