FIG | GDMA | FIG / GDMA | |
Gain YTD | 16.177 | 9.949 | 163% |
Net Assets | 10.1M | 127M | 8% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.80 | 98% |
Turnover | 68.00 | 674.00 | 10% |
Yield | 3.11 | 2.22 | 140% |
Fund Existence | 3 years | 7 years | - |
RSI ODDS (%) |
Stochastic ODDS (%) |
Momentum ODDS (%) |
MACD ODDS (%) |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
Advances ODDS (%) |
Declines ODDS (%) |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
Aroon ODDS (%) |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
RSPC | 38.26 | 0.48 | +1.27% |
Invesco S&P 500® Eql Wght Comm Svcs ETF | |||
IWD | 194.23 | 0.86 | +0.44% |
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | |||
JANW | 34.93 | 0.10 | +0.28% |
AllianzIM US Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF | |||
IBTH | 22.49 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Tr ETF | |||
FLCH | 21.70 | -0.01 | -0.07% |
Franklin FTSE China ETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that GDMA and NEM have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GDMA and NEM's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GDMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GDMA | 100% | +0.38% | ||
NEM - GDMA | 16% Poorly correlated | +2.64% | ||
LMT - GDMA | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.99% | ||
AEE - GDMA | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.77% | ||
NOC - GDMA | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.21% | ||
DLTR - GDMA | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.34% | ||
More |