Ad is loading...
FIG vs TUG
FIG vs TUG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIG vs. TUG commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIG is a StrongBuy and TUG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TUG has more net assets: 196M vs. FIG (12.6M). FIG has a higher annual dividend yield than TUG: FIG (5.396) vs TUG (2.830). FIG was incepted earlier than TUG: FIG (3 years) vs TUG (3 years). TUG has a higher turnover FIG (71.00) vs FIG (71.00).
| FIG | TUG | FIG / TUG | |
| Gain YTD | 5.396 | 2.830 | 191% |
| Net Assets | 12.6M | 196M | 6% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 71.00 | 423.00 | 17% |
| Yield | 3.91 | 0.66 | 590% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| TUG | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
TUG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TUG has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TUG jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TUG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUG | 100% | -1.98% | ||
| CDNS - TUG | 77% Closely correlated | -4.40% | ||
| LRCX - TUG | 76% Closely correlated | -3.37% | ||
| SNPS - TUG | 76% Closely correlated | -3.87% | ||
| KLAC - TUG | 76% Closely correlated | -3.00% | ||
| AMAT - TUG | 74% Closely correlated | -2.29% | ||
More | ||||