Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIJBX vs FKTQX
FIJBX vs FKTQX Comparison
Open Charts FIJBX vs FKTQX
Fidelity Advisor California Muni Inc Z
Price$11.97
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.77B
Franklin CA Tax Free Income R6
Price$6.57
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.57B
FIJBX vs FKTQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIJBX vs. FKTQX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIJBX is a Hold and FKTQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTQX has more cash in the bank: 12.6B vs. FIJBX (1.77B). FKTQX pays higher dividends than FIJBX: FKTQX (3.91) vs FIJBX (2.95). FIJBX was incepted earlier than FKTQX: FIJBX (7 years) vs FKTQX (8 years). FKTQX (0.48) is less costly to investors than FIJBX (0.40). FIJBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FKTQX (7.96). FIJBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKTQX: FIJBX (0) vs FKTQX (1000000). FIJBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.51 vs. FKTQX (-0.38). FIJBX return over 5 years is better than : 2.57 vs. FKTQX (-3.09).
| FIJBX | FKTQX | FIJBX / FKTQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.48 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.48 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.359 | -1.780 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.77B | 12.6B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.95 | 3.91 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.51 | -0.38 | -400% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.29 | 5.38 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.57 | -3.09 | -83% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement