Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIKMX vs RDMAX
FIKMX vs RDMAX Comparison
Open Charts FIKMX vs RDMAX
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Z
Price$12.11
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.12B
Return Stacked Bal Allc & Sys Macro A
Price$19.21
Change+$0.18 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44M
FIKMX vs RDMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKMX vs. RDMAX commentary
Jun 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKMX is a Hold and RDMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIKMX has more cash in the bank: 5.12B vs. RDMAX (41.4M). FIKMX (4.73) and RDMAX (4.58) have matching dividends . FIKMX was incepted earlier than RDMAX: FIKMX (7 years) vs RDMAX (9 years). RDMAX (2.54) is less costly to investors than FIKMX (0.57). FIKMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. RDMAX (0.00). FIKMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDMAX: FIKMX (0) vs RDMAX (1000). FIKMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.84 vs. RDMAX (-7.08). FIKMX return over 5 years is better than : 36.67 vs. RDMAX (8.74).
| FIKMX | RDMAX | FIKMX / RDMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 2.26 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 2.54 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.992 | -5.323 | -56% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.12B | 41.4M | 12,360% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.73 | 4.58 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.84 | -7.08 | -125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.42 | -17.83 | -98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.67 | 8.74 | 419% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers