Ad is loading...
FIKTX vs LOLDX
FIKTX vs LOLDX Comparison
Open Charts FIKTX vs LOLDX
Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Z
Price$8.51
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.43B
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income F3
Price$3.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.01B
FIKTX vs LOLDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIKTX vs. LOLDX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIKTX is a Hold and LOLDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOLDX has more cash in the bank: 42B vs. FIKTX (2.43B). LOLDX pays higher dividends than FIKTX: LOLDX (5.23) vs FIKTX (4.15). FIKTX was incepted earlier than LOLDX: FIKTX (7 years) vs LOLDX (8 years). LOLDX (0.31) is less costly to investors than FIKTX (0.25). LOLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FIKTX (68.00). FIKTX (0) and LOLDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LOLDX (6.78) and FIKTX (6.53) have marching annual gain over last year. LOLDX return over 5 years is better than : 16.67 vs. FIKTX (9.58).
| FIKTX | LOLDX | FIKTX / LOLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.31 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.31 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.778 | 1.573 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.43B | 42B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.15 | 5.23 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.53 | 6.78 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.92 | 11.72 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.58 | 16.67 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |