Ad is loading...
FIOFX vs RBHHX
FIOFX vs RBHHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIOFX vs. RBHHX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIOFX is a Hold and RBHHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBHHX has more cash in the bank: 38.4B vs. FIOFX (21.3B). FIOFX pays higher dividends than RBHHX: FIOFX (1.98) vs RBHHX (0.74). FIOFX was incepted earlier than RBHHX: FIOFX (16 years) vs RBHHX (11 years). RBHHX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FIOFX (0.12). FIOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 8.00 vs. RBHHX (5.00). FIOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBHHX: FIOFX (0) vs RBHHX (250). FIOFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.98 vs. RBHHX (5.81). FIOFX return over 5 years is better than : 74.16 vs. RBHHX (46.08).
| FIOFX | RBHHX | FIOFX / RBHHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.12 | 1.17 | 10% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.12 | 1.17 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.890 | 1.067 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.3B | 38.4B | 55% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.98 | 0.74 | 265% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.98 | 5.81 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.29 | 22.05 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.16 | 46.08 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.40 | 55.25 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...