Ad is loading...
FIQFX vs GSACX
FIQFX vs GSACX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs GSACX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$37.47
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$17.77
Change-$0.03 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.27M
FIQFX vs GSACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. GSACX commentary
Apr 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Hold and GSACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.18B vs. GSACX (32.3M). FIQFX pays higher dividends than GSACX: FIQFX (1.51) vs GSACX (0.30). FIQFX was incepted earlier than GSACX: FIQFX (7 years) vs GSACX (28 years). GSACX (2.67) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). GSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSACX: FIQFX (0) vs GSACX (1000). GSACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.22 vs. FIQFX (14.64). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : 6.73 vs. GSACX (-22.87).
| FIQFX | GSACX | FIQFX / GSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 2.21 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 2.67 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.776 | 4.644 | -60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 32.3M | 3,638% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 0.30 | 505% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.64 | 19.22 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.66 | -17.73 | -60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.73 | -22.87 | -29% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -14.91 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...