Ad is loading...
FIQFX vs GSAGX
FIQFX vs GSAGX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs GSAGX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$36.79
Change+$0.19 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
Goldman Sachs China Equity A
Price$20.29
Change+$0.08 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.6M
FIQFX vs GSAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. GSAGX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Hold and GSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.18B vs. GSAGX (31.6M). FIQFX pays higher dividends than GSAGX: FIQFX (1.51) vs GSAGX (1.26). FIQFX was incepted earlier than GSAGX: FIQFX (7 years) vs GSAGX (31 years). GSAGX (1.92) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). GSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAGX: FIQFX (0) vs GSAGX (1000). GSAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.33 vs. FIQFX (12.83). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.89 vs. GSAGX (-20.80).
| FIQFX | GSAGX | FIQFX / GSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.46 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.92 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.034 | 3.165 | -159% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 31.6M | 3,718% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.26 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.83 | 18.33 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.86 | -17.05 | -52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.89 | -20.80 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -7.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers