Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQFX vs LNGZX
FIQFX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs LNGZX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$44.58
Change+$0.10 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$42.47
Change-$0.13 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.97M
FIQFX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. LNGZX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Hold and LNGZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. LNGZX (47M). FIQFX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: FIQFX (1.39) vs LNGZX (1.05). FIQFX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FIQFX (7 years) vs LNGZX (28 years). LNGZX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FIQFX (0) vs LNGZX (2000). LNGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.69 vs. FIQFX (19.70). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : 4.67 vs. LNGZX (-32.41).
| FIQFX | LNGZX | FIQFX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.24 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.39 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.672 | 15.189 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 47M | 2,630% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.05 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.70 | 23.69 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.84 | -10.09 | -315% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.67 | -32.41 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 1.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement