Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQFX vs LNGZX
FIQFX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs LNGZX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$47.95
Change+$0.15 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$45.12
Change+$0.13 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.29M
FIQFX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. LNGZX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Buy and LNGZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. LNGZX (49.3M). FIQFX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: FIQFX (1.32) vs LNGZX (1.03). FIQFX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FIQFX (7 years) vs LNGZX (28 years). LNGZX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FIQFX (0) vs LNGZX (2000). LNGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.94 vs. FIQFX (32.59). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : 5.09 vs. LNGZX (-33.93).
| FIQFX | LNGZX | FIQFX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.24 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.39 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.027 | 22.023 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 49.3M | 2,647% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 1.03 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.59 | 36.94 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.95 | 7.00 | 699% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.09 | -33.93 | -15% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.29 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement