Ad is loading...
FIQFX vs LNGZX
FIQFX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs LNGZX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$38.37
Change+$0.28 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$39.74
Change+$0.32 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.85M
FIQFX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. LNGZX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Buy and LNGZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.18B vs. LNGZX (44.9M). FIQFX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: FIQFX (1.51) vs LNGZX (1.07). FIQFX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FIQFX (7 years) vs LNGZX (28 years). LNGZX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FIQFX (0) vs LNGZX (2000). LNGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.30 vs. FIQFX (14.57). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : 7.20 vs. LNGZX (-25.15).
| FIQFX | LNGZX | FIQFX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.24 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.39 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.168 | 6.916 | -17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 44.9M | 2,617% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.07 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | 19.30 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.48 | -2.58 | -831% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.20 | -25.15 | -29% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -17.46 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...