Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQFX vs LNGZX
FIQFX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs LNGZX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$46.85
Change-$0.02 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$44.93
Change-$0.34 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.68M
FIQFX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. LNGZX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a StrongBuy and LNGZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. LNGZX (49.7M). FIQFX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: FIQFX (1.39) vs LNGZX (1.05). FIQFX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FIQFX (7 years) vs LNGZX (28 years). LNGZX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FIQFX (0) vs LNGZX (2000). LNGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.19 vs. FIQFX (34.11). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : 6.37 vs. LNGZX (-31.82).
| FIQFX | LNGZX | FIQFX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.24 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.39 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.614 | 22.783 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 49.7M | 2,487% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.05 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.11 | 40.19 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.99 | 2.87 | 1,535% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.37 | -31.82 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 11.17 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement