Ad is loading...
FIQFX vs MCSMX
FIQFX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs MCSMX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$36.41
Change+$2.22 (+6.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$8.72
Change+$0.39 (+4.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.66M
FIQFX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. MCSMX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Hold and MCSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.18B vs. MCSMX (65.7M). FIQFX pays higher dividends than MCSMX: FIQFX (1.51) vs MCSMX (1.25). FIQFX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: FIQFX (7 years) vs MCSMX (14 years). MCSMX (1.40) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). MCSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.05 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSMX: FIQFX (0) vs MCSMX (2500). FIQFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.61 vs. MCSMX (-6.20). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : -0.31 vs. MCSMX (-40.69).
| FIQFX | MCSMX | FIQFX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.40 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.40 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.287 | -8.260 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 65.7M | 1,788% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.25 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.61 | -6.20 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.52 | -32.03 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.31 | -40.69 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -12.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers