Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQFX vs MCSMX
FIQFX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs MCSMX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$42.38
Change-$0.45 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$9.67
Change-$0.20 (-2.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.19M
FIQFX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. MCSMX commentary
Jun 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Buy and MCSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.15B vs. MCSMX (60.2M). FIQFX pays higher dividends than MCSMX: FIQFX (1.50) vs MCSMX (1.28). FIQFX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: FIQFX (7 years) vs MCSMX (14 years). MCSMX (1.61) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). MCSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.39 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSMX: FIQFX (0) vs MCSMX (2500). FIQFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.40 vs. MCSMX (10.74). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : 3.40 vs. MCSMX (-45.98).
| FIQFX | MCSMX | FIQFX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.40 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.61 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.964 | 6.498 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 60.2M | 1,909% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 1.28 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.40 | 10.74 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.02 | -18.06 | -139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.40 | -45.98 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -4.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement