Ad is loading...
FISRX vs RLBEX
FISRX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts FISRX vs RLBEX
Franklin Income R
Price$2.28
Change+$0.01 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.78B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$34.28
Change-$0.03 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.35B
FISRX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FISRX vs. RLBEX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FISRX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. FISRX (71.8B). FISRX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: FISRX (5.44) vs RLBEX (1.98). FISRX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: FISRX (23 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). FISRX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). FISRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.72 vs. RLBEX (44.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FISRX: RLBEX (250) vs FISRX (1000). FISRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.00 vs. RLBEX (4.20). FISRX return over 5 years is better than : 45.74 vs. RLBEX (36.57).
| FISRX | RLBEX | FISRX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.59 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.59 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.920 | 0.337 | 273% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.8B | 234B | 31% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.44 | 1.98 | 276% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.00 | 4.20 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.20 | 21.53 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.74 | 36.57 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.33 | 52.73 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...