Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FITE vs XLK
FITE vs XLK Comparison
Open Charts FITE vs XLK
SPDR® S&P Kensho Future Security ETF
Price$75.62
Change+$0.46 (+0.61%)
Volume$5.62K
Net Assets72.94M
The Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF
Price$253.70
Change+$2.73 (+1.09%)
Volume$39.89K
Net Assets79.18B
FITE vs XLK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FITE vs. XLK commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FITE is a Buy and XLK is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLK has more net assets: 79.2B vs. FITE (72.9M). FITE has a higher annual dividend yield than XLK: FITE (13.060) vs XLK (8.303). FITE was incepted earlier than XLK: FITE (8 years) vs XLK (27 years). XLK (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than FITE (0.45). XLK has a higher turnover FITE (32.00) vs FITE (32.00).
| FITE | XLK | FITE / XLK | |
| Gain YTD | 13.060 | 8.303 | 157% |
| Net Assets | 72.9M | 79.2B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.08 | 563% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 39.00 | 82% |
| Yield | 0.17 | 0.61 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FITE | XLK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 7 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 79% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FITE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FITE has been closely correlated with SANM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FITE jumps, then SANM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FITE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FITE | 100% | +0.61% | ||
| SANM - FITE | 70% Closely correlated | +2.79% | ||
| DDOG - FITE | 68% Closely correlated | +2.03% | ||
| RKLB - FITE | 65% Loosely correlated | +3.93% | ||
| NET - FITE | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| RBRK - FITE | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
More | ||||
XLK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLK has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLK jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK | 100% | -0.89% | ||
| LRCX - XLK | 84% Closely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| KLAC - XLK | 82% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| MPWR - XLK | 81% Closely correlated | +2.13% | ||
| CDNS - XLK | 80% Closely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| AMAT - XLK | 80% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||