Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FJAMX vs RBETX
FJAMX vs RBETX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FJAMX vs. RBETX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FJAMX is a Hold and RBETX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBETX has more cash in the bank: 50.6B vs. FJAMX (3.65B). FJAMX pays higher dividends than RBETX: FJAMX (1.82) vs RBETX (1.29). FJAMX was incepted earlier than RBETX: FJAMX (7 years) vs RBETX (18 years). RBETX (1.42) is less costly to investors than FJAMX (0.71). FJAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. RBETX (7.00). FJAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBETX: FJAMX (0) vs RBETX (250). FJAMX (9.89) and RBETX (9.73) have marching annual gain over last year. FJAMX return over 5 years is better than : 32.18 vs. RBETX (28.60).
| FJAMX | RBETX | FJAMX / RBETX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.42 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.42 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.375 | 7.578 | 97% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.65B | 50.6B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 1.29 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.89 | 9.73 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.23 | 26.87 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.18 | 28.60 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 46.35 | - |