Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FJAMX vs RBETX
FJAMX vs RBETX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FJAMX vs. RBETX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FJAMX is a Hold and RBETX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBETX has more cash in the bank: 49.8B vs. FJAMX (3.65B). FJAMX pays higher dividends than RBETX: FJAMX (1.82) vs RBETX (1.29). FJAMX was incepted earlier than RBETX: FJAMX (7 years) vs RBETX (18 years). RBETX (1.42) is less costly to investors than FJAMX (0.71). FJAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. RBETX (7.00). FJAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBETX: FJAMX (0) vs RBETX (250). RBETX (7.94) and FJAMX (7.79) have marching annual gain over last year. FJAMX return over 5 years is better than : 25.72 vs. RBETX (22.04).
| FJAMX | RBETX | FJAMX / RBETX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.42 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.42 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.128 | 5.191 | 99% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.65B | 49.8B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 1.29 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.79 | 7.94 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.26 | 16.94 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.72 | 22.04 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 42.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement