Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FJAMX vs RBETX
FJAMX vs RBETX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FJAMX vs. RBETX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FJAMX is a Hold and RBETX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBETX has more cash in the bank: 50.7B vs. FJAMX (3.88B). FJAMX pays higher dividends than RBETX: FJAMX (1.76) vs RBETX (1.25). FJAMX was incepted earlier than RBETX: FJAMX (7 years) vs RBETX (18 years). RBETX (1.42) is less costly to investors than FJAMX (0.71). FJAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. RBETX (7.00). FJAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBETX: FJAMX (0) vs RBETX (250). RBETX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.51 vs. FJAMX (8.02). FJAMX return over 5 years is better than : 26.71 vs. RBETX (23.82).
| FJAMX | RBETX | FJAMX / RBETX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.42 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.42 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.734 | 8.294 | 93% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.88B | 50.7B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 1.25 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.02 | 8.51 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.10 | 28.41 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.71 | 23.82 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 44.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement