Ad is loading...
FJAMX vs RBETX
FJAMX vs RBETX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FJAMX vs. RBETX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FJAMX is a Hold and RBETX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBETX has more cash in the bank: 48.6B vs. FJAMX (3.51B). FJAMX pays higher dividends than RBETX: FJAMX (1.85) vs RBETX (1.33). FJAMX was incepted earlier than RBETX: FJAMX (7 years) vs RBETX (18 years). RBETX (1.42) is less costly to investors than FJAMX (0.71). FJAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. RBETX (7.00). FJAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBETX: FJAMX (0) vs RBETX (250). RBETX (8.16) and FJAMX (7.88) have marching annual gain over last year. FJAMX return over 5 years is better than : 32.65 vs. RBETX (28.97).
| FJAMX | RBETX | FJAMX / RBETX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.42 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.42 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.526 | 2.088 | 73% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.51B | 48.6B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.85 | 1.33 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.88 | 8.16 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.47 | 14.08 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.65 | 28.97 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 37.38 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...