Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FJMNX vs NTCCX
FJMNX vs NTCCX Comparison
Open Charts FJMNX vs NTCCX
Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond A
Price$10.38
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets645.55M
Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond C
Price$10.38
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets645.55M
FJMNX vs NTCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FJMNX vs. NTCCX commentary
Jun 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FJMNX is a Hold and NTCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FJMNX (646M) and NTCCX (646M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FJMNX pays higher dividends than NTCCX: FJMNX (3.61) vs NTCCX (2.77). FJMNX was incepted earlier than NTCCX: FJMNX (37 years) vs NTCCX (11 years). NTCCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than FJMNX (0.79). FJMNX (26.00) and NTCCX (26.00) have comparable annual turnover. FJMNX (2500) and NTCCX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FJMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.20 vs. NTCCX (-0.53). FJMNX return over 5 years is better than : 0.96 vs. NTCCX (-2.94).
| FJMNX | NTCCX | FJMNX / NTCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.59 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.59 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.824 | -2.061 | 89% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 646M | 646M | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.61 | 2.77 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.20 | -0.53 | -38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.80 | 1.41 | 270% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.96 | -2.94 | -33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.57 | 10.36 | 179% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement