Ad is loading...
FJMNX vs RMTCX
FJMNX vs RMTCX Comparison
Open Charts FJMNX vs RMTCX
Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond A
Price$10.45
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets653.16M
Columbia Minnesota Tax-Exempt C
Price$18.93
Change-$0.06 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets474.08M
FJMNX vs RMTCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FJMNX vs. RMTCX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FJMNX is a Hold and RMTCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FJMNX has more cash in the bank: 653M vs. RMTCX (474M). FJMNX pays higher dividends than RMTCX: FJMNX (3.59) vs RMTCX (2.46). FJMNX was incepted earlier than RMTCX: FJMNX (37 years) vs RMTCX (25 years). RMTCX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FJMNX (0.79). FJMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. RMTCX (10.00). RMTCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FJMNX: RMTCX (2000) vs FJMNX (2500). FJMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.87 vs. RMTCX (0.15). FJMNX return over 5 years is better than : 3.57 vs. RMTCX (-3.38).
| FJMNX | RMTCX | FJMNX / RMTCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.56 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.56 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.457 | -2.140 | 68% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 653M | 474M | 138% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.59 | 2.46 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.87 | 0.15 | 571% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.89 | 3.16 | 218% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.57 | -3.38 | -105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.77 | 4.83 | 388% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...