Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FJMNX vs RMTCX
FJMNX vs RMTCX Comparison
Open Charts FJMNX vs RMTCX
Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond A
Price$10.38
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets645.55M
Columbia Minnesota Tax-Exempt C
Price$18.77
Change-$0.05 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets473.96M
FJMNX vs RMTCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FJMNX vs. RMTCX commentary
Jun 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FJMNX is a Hold and RMTCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FJMNX has more cash in the bank: 646M vs. RMTCX (474M). FJMNX pays higher dividends than RMTCX: FJMNX (3.61) vs RMTCX (2.48). FJMNX was incepted earlier than RMTCX: FJMNX (37 years) vs RMTCX (25 years). RMTCX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FJMNX (0.79). FJMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. RMTCX (10.00). RMTCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FJMNX: RMTCX (2000) vs FJMNX (2500). FJMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.01 vs. RMTCX (-1.15). FJMNX return over 5 years is better than : 0.77 vs. RMTCX (-6.16).
| FJMNX | RMTCX | FJMNX / RMTCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.56 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.56 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.013 | -3.060 | 66% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 646M | 474M | 136% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.61 | 2.48 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.01 | -1.15 | -0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.60 | -0.94 | -385% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.77 | -6.16 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.35 | 3.99 | 460% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers