Ad is loading...
FJTKX vs RBHTX
FJTKX vs RBHTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FJTKX vs. RBHTX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FJTKX is a Hold and RBHTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBHTX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. FJTKX (20.1B). FJTKX pays higher dividends than RBHTX: FJTKX (1.66) vs RBHTX (0.47). FJTKX was incepted earlier than RBHTX: FJTKX (8 years) vs RBHTX (18 years). RBHTX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FJTKX (0.46). FJTKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. RBHTX (5.00). FJTKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBHTX: FJTKX (0) vs RBHTX (250). FJTKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.58 vs. RBHTX (5.33). RBHTX (38.04) and FJTKX (37.42) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FJTKX | RBHTX | FJTKX / RBHTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 1.46 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 1.46 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.075 | -1.276 | -6% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.1B | 37.6B | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 0.47 | 353% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.58 | 5.33 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.63 | 15.68 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.42 | 38.04 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 52.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...