Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKACX vs RGEBX
FKACX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FKACX vs RGEBX
Franklin Growth Opportunities C
Price$34.10
Change+$0.10 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.71B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$80.35
Change+$0.24 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.99B
FKACX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKACX vs. RGEBX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKACX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. FKACX (4.71B). FKACX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FKACX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FKACX (26 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). FKACX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). FKACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.59 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKACX: RGEBX (250) vs FKACX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.66 vs. FKACX (1.88). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 39.33 vs. FKACX (-13.80).
| FKACX | RGEBX | FKACX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.09 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.09 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.463 | 12.472 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.71B | 325B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.88 | 17.66 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.47 | 45.03 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.80 | 39.33 | -35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.39 | 77.81 | 16% |