Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKBAX vs PTTNX
FKBAX vs PTTNX Comparison
Open Charts FKBAX vs PTTNX
Franklin Total Return A
Price$8.26
Change+$0.05 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.01B
PIMCO Total Return I-3
Price$8.58
Change+$0.06 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.96B
FKBAX vs PTTNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKBAX vs. PTTNX commentary
Jun 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKBAX is a Hold and PTTNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PTTNX has more cash in the bank: 44B vs. FKBAX (3.01B). PTTNX pays higher dividends than FKBAX: PTTNX (4.50) vs FKBAX (3.98). FKBAX was incepted earlier than PTTNX: FKBAX (27 years) vs PTTNX (7 years). FKBAX (0.94) is less costly to investors than PTTNX (0.71). PTTNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 469.00 vs. FKBAX (100.79). FKBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PTTNX: FKBAX (1000) vs PTTNX (1000000). PTTNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.57 vs. FKBAX (3.90). FKBAX return over 5 years is better than : -2.49 vs. PTTNX (-5.22).
| FKBAX | PTTNX | FKBAX / PTTNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.66 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.71 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.703 | 2.351 | 72% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.01B | 44B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.98 | 4.50 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.90 | 4.57 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.80 | 5.87 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.49 | -5.22 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.50 | N/A | - |