Ad is loading...
FKBAX vs PTTNX
FKBAX vs PTTNX Comparison
Open Charts FKBAX vs PTTNX
Franklin Total Return A
Price$8.20
Change-$0.01 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.02B
PIMCO Total Return I-3
Price$8.51
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.52B
FKBAX vs PTTNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKBAX vs. PTTNX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKBAX is a Hold and PTTNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PTTNX has more cash in the bank: 44.5B vs. FKBAX (3.02B). PTTNX pays higher dividends than FKBAX: PTTNX (4.46) vs FKBAX (3.97). FKBAX was incepted earlier than PTTNX: FKBAX (27 years) vs PTTNX (7 years). FKBAX (0.94) is less costly to investors than PTTNX (0.71). PTTNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 469.00 vs. FKBAX (100.79). FKBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PTTNX: FKBAX (1000) vs PTTNX (1000000). PTTNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.96 vs. FKBAX (5.20). FKBAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.51 vs. PTTNX (-4.63).
| FKBAX | PTTNX | FKBAX / PTTNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.66 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.71 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.585 | 2.307 | 69% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.02B | 44.5B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.97 | 4.46 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.20 | 5.96 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.09 | 6.60 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.51 | -4.63 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.53 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...