Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKIPX vs FSNOX
FKIPX vs FSNOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKIPX vs. FSNOX commentary
Jun 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKIPX is a Hold and FSNOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSNOX has more cash in the bank: 12.6B vs. FKIPX (6.71B). FKIPX pays higher dividends than FSNOX: FKIPX (2.83) vs FSNOX (2.59). FKIPX was incepted earlier than FSNOX: FKIPX (5 years) vs FSNOX (8 years). FSNOX (0.49) is less costly to investors than FKIPX (0.05). FSNOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. FKIPX (13.00). FSNOX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKIPX: FSNOX (0) vs FKIPX (2000000000). FKIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.32 vs. FSNOX (4.25).
| FKIPX | FSNOX | FKIPX / FSNOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.49 | 10% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.49 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.068 | 3.303 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.71B | 12.6B | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.83 | 2.59 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.32 | 4.25 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.97 | 21.56 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 6.97 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement