Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKIPX vs FSNOX
FKIPX vs FSNOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKIPX vs. FSNOX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKIPX is a Hold and FSNOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSNOX has more cash in the bank: 12.9B vs. FKIPX (6.86B). FKIPX pays higher dividends than FSNOX: FKIPX (2.76) vs FSNOX (2.52). FKIPX was incepted earlier than FSNOX: FKIPX (5 years) vs FSNOX (8 years). FSNOX (0.49) is less costly to investors than FKIPX (0.05). FSNOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. FKIPX (13.00). FSNOX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKIPX: FSNOX (0) vs FKIPX (2000000000). FKIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.34 vs. FSNOX (4.71). FKIPX return over 5 years is better than : 21.81 vs. FSNOX (6.19).
| FKIPX | FSNOX | FKIPX / FSNOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.49 | 10% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.49 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.979 | 5.398 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.86B | 12.9B | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.76 | 2.52 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.34 | 4.71 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.69 | 23.38 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.81 | 6.19 | 352% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement