Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKIPX vs RBCTX
FKIPX vs RBCTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKIPX vs. RBCTX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKIPX is a Hold and RBCTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBCTX has more cash in the bank: 15B vs. FKIPX (6.86B). FKIPX pays higher dividends than RBCTX: FKIPX (2.76) vs RBCTX (1.82). FKIPX was incepted earlier than RBCTX: FKIPX (5 years) vs RBCTX (18 years). RBCTX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FKIPX (0.05). FKIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. RBCTX (5.00). RBCTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKIPX: RBCTX (250) vs FKIPX (2000000000). RBCTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.54 vs. FKIPX (5.34). FKIPX return over 5 years is better than : 21.81 vs. RBCTX (15.62).
| FKIPX | RBCTX | FKIPX / RBCTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 1.39 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 1.39 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.979 | 7.447 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000000 | 250 | 800,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.86B | 15B | 46% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.76 | 1.82 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.34 | 6.54 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.69 | 20.74 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.81 | 15.62 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 30.70 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement