Ad is loading...
FKIPX vs RBCTX
FKIPX vs RBCTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKIPX vs. RBCTX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKIPX is a Hold and RBCTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBCTX has more cash in the bank: 14.8B vs. FKIPX (6.64B). FKIPX pays higher dividends than RBCTX: FKIPX (2.84) vs RBCTX (1.91). FKIPX was incepted earlier than RBCTX: FKIPX (5 years) vs RBCTX (18 years). RBCTX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FKIPX (0.05). FKIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. RBCTX (5.00). RBCTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKIPX: RBCTX (250) vs FKIPX (2000000000). RBCTX (5.13) and FKIPX (5.04) have marching annual gain over last year.
| FKIPX | RBCTX | FKIPX / RBCTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 1.39 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 1.39 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.648 | 2.508 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000000 | 250 | 800,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.64B | 14.8B | 45% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.84 | 1.91 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.04 | 5.13 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.47 | 11.55 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 18.42 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 22.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...