Ad is loading...
FKIPX vs RRCTX
FKIPX vs RRCTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKIPX vs. RRCTX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKIPX is a Hold and RRCTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRCTX has more cash in the bank: 14.8B vs. FKIPX (6.64B). RRCTX (2.96) and FKIPX (2.84) have matching dividends . FKIPX was incepted earlier than RRCTX: FKIPX (5 years) vs RRCTX (16 years). RRCTX (0.30) is less costly to investors than FKIPX (0.05). FKIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. RRCTX (5.00). RRCTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKIPX: RRCTX (250) vs FKIPX (2000000000). RRCTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.32 vs. FKIPX (5.04).
| FKIPX | RRCTX | FKIPX / RRCTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.30 | 17% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.30 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.648 | 2.897 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000000 | 250 | 800,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.64B | 14.8B | 45% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.84 | 2.96 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.04 | 6.32 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.47 | 14.68 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 24.17 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 31.26 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...