Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKIPX vs VTWNX
FKIPX vs VTWNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKIPX vs. VTWNX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKIPX is a Hold and VTWNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTWNX has more cash in the bank: 35.6B vs. FKIPX (6.86B). VTWNX (2.83) and FKIPX (2.76) have matching dividends . FKIPX was incepted earlier than VTWNX: FKIPX (5 years) vs VTWNX (19 years). VTWNX (0.08) is less costly to investors than FKIPX (0.05). FKIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. VTWNX (4.00). VTWNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKIPX: VTWNX (1000) vs FKIPX (2000000000). FKIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.64 vs. VTWNX (0.80). FKIPX return over 5 years is better than : 21.52 vs. VTWNX (-8.23).
| FKIPX | VTWNX | FKIPX / VTWNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.08 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.08 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.724 | 6.156 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000000 | 1000 | 200,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.86B | 35.6B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.76 | 2.83 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.64 | 0.80 | 578% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.14 | 10.76 | 215% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.52 | -8.23 | -262% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 10.21 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers