Ad is loading...
FKISX vs LANSX
FKISX vs LANSX Comparison
Open Charts FKISX vs LANSX
Fidelity Advisor Municipal Income C
Price$11.90
Change-$0.03 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.36B
Lord Abbett National Tax Free A
Price$10.12
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.58B
FKISX vs LANSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKISX vs. LANSX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKISX is a Hold and LANSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LANSX (4.58B) and FKISX (4.36B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . LANSX pays higher dividends than FKISX: LANSX (3.77) vs FKISX (1.93). FKISX was incepted earlier than LANSX: FKISX (7 years) vs LANSX (41 years). FKISX (1.50) is less costly to investors than LANSX (0.78). LANSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FKISX (20.00). FKISX has a lower initial minimum investment than LANSX: FKISX (0) vs LANSX (1000). LANSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.66 vs. FKISX (-0.35). LANSX return over 5 years is better than : 5.28 vs. FKISX (1.11).
| FKISX | LANSX | FKISX / LANSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.78 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.78 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.509 | -1.906 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | 2% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.36B | 4.58B | 95% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.93 | 3.77 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.35 | 0.66 | -53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.51 | 8.76 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.11 | 5.28 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 11.05 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...