Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKISX vs LANSX
FKISX vs LANSX Comparison
Open Charts FKISX vs LANSX
Fidelity Advisor Municipal Income C
Price$11.83
Change-$0.02 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.34B
Lord Abbett National Tax Free A
Price$9.92
Change-$0.03 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.48B
FKISX vs LANSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKISX vs. LANSX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKISX is a Hold and LANSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LANSX (4.48B) and FKISX (4.34B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . LANSX pays higher dividends than FKISX: LANSX (3.83) vs FKISX (1.95). FKISX was incepted earlier than LANSX: FKISX (7 years) vs LANSX (41 years). FKISX (1.50) is less costly to investors than LANSX (0.78). LANSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FKISX (20.00). FKISX has a lower initial minimum investment than LANSX: FKISX (0) vs LANSX (1000). FKISX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.55 vs. LANSX (-1.93). LANSX return over 5 years is better than : -1.93 vs. FKISX (-3.77).
| FKISX | LANSX | FKISX / LANSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.78 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.78 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.833 | -3.120 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | 2% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.34B | 4.48B | 97% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.95 | 3.83 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.55 | -1.93 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.98 | 5.07 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.77 | -1.93 | 195% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 10.46 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement