Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKNQX vs PBFCX
FKNQX vs PBFCX Comparison
Open Charts FKNQX vs PBFCX
Franklin NY Intermediate T/F Income A
Price$10.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets503.7M
PIMCO NY Municipal C
Price$10.42
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets876.31M
FKNQX vs PBFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKNQX vs. PBFCX commentary
Jun 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKNQX is a Hold and PBFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBFCX has more cash in the bank: 876M vs. FKNQX (504M). PBFCX (2.56) and FKNQX (2.47) have matching dividends . FKNQX was incepted earlier than PBFCX: FKNQX (7 years) vs PBFCX (16 years). PBFCX (1.52) is less costly to investors than FKNQX (0.86). PBFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. FKNQX (11.18). FKNQX (1000) and PBFCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FKNQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.32 vs. PBFCX (-1.55). FKNQX return over 5 years is better than : -1.86 vs. PBFCX (-3.00).
| FKNQX | PBFCX | FKNQX / PBFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.52 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.52 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.084 | -2.351 | 4% |
| Front Load | 2% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 504M | 876M | 58% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.47 | 2.56 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.32 | -1.55 | -85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.46 | 5.65 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.86 | -3.00 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 9.40 | - |