Ad is loading...
FKNQX vs PBFCX
FKNQX vs PBFCX Comparison
Open Charts FKNQX vs PBFCX
Franklin NY Intermediate T/F Income A
Price$10.51
Change+$0.03 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets500.78M
PIMCO NY Municipal C
Price$10.44
Change+$0.04 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets874.13M
FKNQX vs PBFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKNQX vs. PBFCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKNQX is a Hold and PBFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBFCX has more cash in the bank: 874M vs. FKNQX (501M). PBFCX (2.54) and FKNQX (2.42) have matching dividends . FKNQX was incepted earlier than PBFCX: FKNQX (7 years) vs PBFCX (16 years). PBFCX (1.52) is less costly to investors than FKNQX (0.86). PBFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. FKNQX (11.18). FKNQX (1000) and PBFCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FKNQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.51 vs. PBFCX (-0.62). PBFCX return over 5 years is better than : -0.45 vs. FKNQX (-0.93).
| FKNQX | PBFCX | FKNQX / PBFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.52 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.52 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.650 | -2.964 | 56% |
| Front Load | 2% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 501M | 874M | 57% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.42 | 2.54 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.51 | -0.62 | -83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.32 | 2.27 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.93 | -0.45 | 204% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 7.28 | - |