Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKTFX vs JCSRX
FKTFX vs JCSRX Comparison
Open Charts FKTFX vs JCSRX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A1
Price$6.55
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.35B
JHancock CA Municipal Bond R6
Price$9.51
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets516.27M
FKTFX vs JCSRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKTFX vs. JCSRX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKTFX is a Hold and JCSRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTFX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. JCSRX (516M). JCSRX (3.78) and FKTFX (3.72) have matching dividends . FKTFX was incepted earlier than JCSRX: FKTFX (48 years) vs JCSRX (8 years). JCSRX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FKTFX (0.61). JCSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FKTFX (7.96). FKTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than JCSRX: FKTFX (1000) vs JCSRX (1000000). FKTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.01 vs. JCSRX (-0.57). JCSRX return over 5 years is better than : 5.53 vs. FKTFX (-3.60).
| FKTFX | JCSRX | FKTFX / JCSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.52 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.69 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 48 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.928 | -4.066 | 72% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 516M | 2,403% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.72 | 3.78 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.01 | -0.57 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.71 | 6.37 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.60 | 5.53 | -65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.62 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers