Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKTFX vs JCSRX
FKTFX vs JCSRX Comparison
Open Charts FKTFX vs JCSRX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A1
Price$6.49
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.41B
JHancock CA Municipal Bond R6
Price$9.35
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets510.79M
FKTFX vs JCSRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKTFX vs. JCSRX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKTFX is a Hold and JCSRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTFX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. JCSRX (511M). JCSRX (3.89) and FKTFX (3.76) have matching dividends . FKTFX was incepted earlier than JCSRX: FKTFX (49 years) vs JCSRX (8 years). JCSRX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FKTFX (0.60). JCSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FKTFX (7.96). FKTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than JCSRX: FKTFX (1000) vs JCSRX (1000000). FKTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.16 vs. JCSRX (-3.80). JCSRX return over 5 years is better than : 1.25 vs. FKTFX (-6.07).
| FKTFX | JCSRX | FKTFX / JCSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.52 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.69 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 49 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.046 | -5.031 | 61% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 511M | 2,427% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.76 | 3.89 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.16 | -3.80 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.10 | 3.48 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.07 | 1.25 | -485% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.05 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers