Ad is loading...
FKTFX vs JCSRX
FKTFX vs JCSRX Comparison
Open Charts FKTFX vs JCSRX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A1
Price$6.57
Change+$0.03 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.37B
JHancock CA Municipal Bond R6
Price$9.53
Change+$0.05 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets509.56M
FKTFX vs JCSRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKTFX vs. JCSRX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKTFX is a Hold and JCSRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTFX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. JCSRX (510M). JCSRX (3.69) and FKTFX (3.67) have matching dividends . FKTFX was incepted earlier than JCSRX: FKTFX (48 years) vs JCSRX (8 years). JCSRX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FKTFX (0.61). JCSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FKTFX (14.01). FKTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than JCSRX: FKTFX (1000) vs JCSRX (1000000). FKTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.29 vs. JCSRX (-0.82). JCSRX return over 5 years is better than : 7.07 vs. FKTFX (-1.57).
| FKTFX | JCSRX | FKTFX / JCSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.52 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.69 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 48 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.236 | -4.686 | 69% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 510M | 2,431% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.67 | 3.69 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.29 | -0.82 | -36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.19 | 4.79 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.57 | 7.07 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.31 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...