Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKTFX vs JCSRX
FKTFX vs JCSRX Comparison
Open Charts FKTFX vs JCSRX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A1
Price$6.56
Change-$0.01 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.51B
JHancock CA Municipal Bond R6
Price$9.52
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets517.78M
FKTFX vs JCSRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKTFX vs. JCSRX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKTFX is a Hold and JCSRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTFX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. JCSRX (518M). JCSRX (3.86) and FKTFX (3.76) have matching dividends . FKTFX was incepted earlier than JCSRX: FKTFX (48 years) vs JCSRX (8 years). JCSRX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FKTFX (0.61). JCSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FKTFX (7.96). FKTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than JCSRX: FKTFX (1000) vs JCSRX (1000000). FKTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.13 vs. JCSRX (-2.00). JCSRX return over 5 years is better than : 4.26 vs. FKTFX (-3.87).
| FKTFX | JCSRX | FKTFX / JCSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.52 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.69 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 48 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.300 | -3.636 | 63% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5B | 518M | 2,413% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.76 | 3.86 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.13 | -2.00 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.09 | 8.89 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.87 | 4.26 | -91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement