Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKTMX vs NMAAX
FKTMX vs NMAAX Comparison
Open Charts FKTMX vs NMAAX
Franklin MA Tax-Free Income R6
Price$10.18
Change-$0.04 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.18M
Nuveen MA Municipal Bond A
Price$8.93
Change-$0.04 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets438.51M
FKTMX vs NMAAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKTMX vs. NMAAX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKTMX is a Hold and NMAAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMAAX has more cash in the bank: 439M vs. FKTMX (332M). NMAAX (3.28) and FKTMX (3.13) have matching dividends . FKTMX was incepted earlier than NMAAX: FKTMX (8 years) vs NMAAX (31 years). NMAAX (0.79) is less costly to investors than FKTMX (0.59). NMAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. FKTMX (25.42). FKTMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMAAX: FKTMX (0) vs NMAAX (2500). NMAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.09 vs. FKTMX (-0.42). NMAAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.28 vs. FKTMX (-6.33).
| FKTMX | NMAAX | FKTMX / NMAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.79 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.79 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.430 | -1.959 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332M | 439M | 76% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.13 | 3.28 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.42 | -0.09 | 466% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.63 | 5.66 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.33 | -0.28 | 2,248% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 7.74 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement