Ad is loading...
FKTQX vs JCSRX
FKTQX vs JCSRX Comparison
Open Charts FKTQX vs JCSRX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income R6
Price$6.58
Change+$0.02 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.41B
JHancock CA Municipal Bond R6
Price$9.57
Change+$0.04 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets512.76M
FKTQX vs JCSRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKTQX vs. JCSRX commentary
Apr 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKTQX is a Hold and JCSRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTQX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. JCSRX (513M). FKTQX (3.81) and JCSRX (3.69) have matching dividends . FKTQX was incepted earlier than JCSRX: FKTQX (8 years) vs JCSRX (8 years). JCSRX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FKTQX (0.48). JCSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FKTQX (14.01). FKTQX (1000000) and JCSRX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FKTQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.50 vs. JCSRX (0.53). JCSRX return over 5 years is better than : 8.08 vs. FKTQX (-0.40).
| FKTQX | JCSRX | FKTQX / JCSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.52 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.69 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.610 | -3.782 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 513M | 2,417% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.81 | 3.69 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.50 | 0.53 | 282% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.28 | 5.89 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.40 | 8.08 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...