Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKTQX vs LCFFX
FKTQX vs LCFFX Comparison
Open Charts FKTQX vs LCFFX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income R6
Price$6.55
Change-$0.01 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.51B
Lord Abbett California Tax Free F
Price$9.70
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets643.63M
FKTQX vs LCFFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKTQX vs. LCFFX commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKTQX is a Hold and LCFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTQX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. LCFFX (644M). FKTQX pays higher dividends than LCFFX: FKTQX (3.90) vs LCFFX (3.61). FKTQX was incepted earlier than LCFFX: FKTQX (8 years) vs LCFFX (18 years). LCFFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FKTQX (0.48). LCFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FKTQX (7.96). LCFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKTQX: LCFFX (0) vs FKTQX (1000000). FKTQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.00 vs. LCFFX (-1.34). LCFFX return over 5 years is better than : -1.64 vs. FKTQX (-3.44).
| FKTQX | LCFFX | FKTQX / LCFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.67 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.67 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.390 | -2.711 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5B | 644M | 1,941% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.90 | 3.61 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.00 | -1.34 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.43 | 8.87 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.44 | -1.64 | 210% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 9.73 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers