Ad is loading...
FKTQX vs MCAVX
FKTQX vs MCAVX Comparison
Open Charts FKTQX vs MCAVX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income R6
Price$6.61
Change+$0.02 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.47B
MFS CA Municipal Bond I
Price$8.80
Change+$0.04 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets680.88M
FKTQX vs MCAVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKTQX vs. MCAVX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKTQX is a Hold and MCAVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTQX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. MCAVX (681M). FKTQX pays higher dividends than MCAVX: FKTQX (3.81) vs MCAVX (3.56). FKTQX was incepted earlier than MCAVX: FKTQX (8 years) vs MCAVX (9 years). MCAVX (0.61) is less costly to investors than FKTQX (0.48). MCAVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FKTQX (14.01). MCAVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKTQX: MCAVX (0) vs FKTQX (1000000). FKTQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.50 vs. MCAVX (1.13). MCAVX return over 5 years is better than : 7.10 vs. FKTQX (0.43).
| FKTQX | MCAVX | FKTQX / MCAVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.60 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.61 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.462 | -2.577 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5B | 681M | 1,836% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.81 | 3.56 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.50 | 1.13 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.89 | 5.02 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.43 | 7.10 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...