Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKTQX vs MSCCX
FKTQX vs MSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FKTQX vs MSCCX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income R6
Price$6.49
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.41B
NYLI MacKay California Muni
Price$9.26
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.23B
FKTQX vs MSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKTQX vs. MSCCX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKTQX is a Hold and MSCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTQX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. MSCCX (1.23B). FKTQX pays higher dividends than MSCCX: FKTQX (3.91) vs MSCCX (3.31). FKTQX was incepted earlier than MSCCX: FKTQX (8 years) vs MSCCX (12 years). MSCCX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FKTQX (0.47). MSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FKTQX (7.96). MSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKTQX: MSCCX (2500) vs FKTQX (1000000). MSCCX (-2.12) and FKTQX (-2.17) have marching annual gain over last year. MSCCX return over 5 years is better than : -3.15 vs. FKTQX (-5.65).
| FKTQX | MSCCX | FKTQX / MSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 1.03 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 1.04 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.126 | -3.111 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 1.23B | 1,008% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.91 | 3.31 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.17 | -2.12 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.56 | 3.08 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.65 | -3.15 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 18.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement