Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKTQX vs NCAAX
FKTQX vs NCAAX Comparison
Open Charts FKTQX vs NCAAX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income R6
Price$6.53
Change-$0.02 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.46B
Nuveen CA Municipal Bond A
Price$9.64
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.62B
FKTQX vs NCAAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKTQX vs. NCAAX commentary
Jun 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKTQX is a Hold and NCAAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTQX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. NCAAX (1.62B). FKTQX (3.90) and NCAAX (3.81) have matching dividends . FKTQX was incepted earlier than NCAAX: FKTQX (8 years) vs NCAAX (31 years). NCAAX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FKTQX (0.48). NCAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FKTQX (7.96). NCAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKTQX: NCAAX (2500) vs FKTQX (1000000). FKTQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.72 vs. NCAAX (-0.99). NCAAX return over 5 years is better than : -1.06 vs. FKTQX (-3.23).
| FKTQX | NCAAX | FKTQX / NCAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.74 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.74 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.688 | -2.760 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5B | 1.62B | 771% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.90 | 3.81 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.72 | -0.99 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.31 | 2.65 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.23 | -1.06 | 304% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 10.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers