Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKTQX vs NCHAX
FKTQX vs NCHAX Comparison
Open Charts FKTQX vs NCHAX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income R6
Price$6.56
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.51B
Nuveen CA High Yield Municipal Bond A
Price$7.54
Change+$0.01 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets914.46M
FKTQX vs NCHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKTQX vs. NCHAX commentary
Jun 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKTQX is a Hold and NCHAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTQX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. NCHAX (914M). NCHAX pays higher dividends than FKTQX: NCHAX (4.42) vs FKTQX (3.90). FKTQX was incepted earlier than NCHAX: FKTQX (8 years) vs NCHAX (19 years). NCHAX (1.83) is less costly to investors than FKTQX (0.48). NCHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FKTQX (7.96). NCHAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKTQX: NCHAX (2500) vs FKTQX (1000000). FKTQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.85 vs. NCHAX (-2.09). FKTQX return over 5 years is better than : -3.29 vs. NCHAX (-6.21).
| FKTQX | NCHAX | FKTQX / NCHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 1.83 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 1.83 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.241 | -3.649 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5B | 914M | 1,368% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.90 | 4.42 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.85 | -2.09 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.97 | 4.04 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.29 | -6.21 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 8.87 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement