FLD
Price
$11.10
Change
+$0.04 (+0.36%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
MITA
Price
$11.36
Change
-$0.14 (-1.22%)
Updated
Dec 18, 02:26 PM (EDT)
Ad is loading...

FLD vs MITA

Header iconFLD vs MITA Comparison
Open Charts FLD vs MITABanner chart's image
FTAC Emerald Acquisition
Price$11.10
Change+$0.04 (+0.36%)
Volume$19.84K
CapitalizationN/A
Coliseum Acquisition
Price$11.36
Change-$0.14 (-1.22%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
FLD vs MITA Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MITA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLD vs. MITA commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLD is a Buy and MITA is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (FLD: $11.10 vs. MITA: $11.50)
Brand notoriety: FLD and MITA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLD: 16% vs. MITA: 1851%
Market capitalization -- FLD: $151.53M vs. MITA: $103.5M
FLD [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $151.53M. MITA’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $103.5M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMITA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MITA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MITA is a better buy in the long-term than FLD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MITA’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • MITA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLD is a better buy in the short-term than MITA.

Price Growth

FLD (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -1.33% price change this week, while MITA (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +2.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

MITA is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.30% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLD($152M) has a higher market cap than MITA($104M). FLD has higher P/E ratio than MITA: FLD (75.43) vs MITA (40.44). MITA YTD gains are higher at: 7.880 vs. FLD (5.213). MITA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.45M vs. FLD (-3.73M). FLD has more cash in the bank: 29.8K vs. MITA (0). MITA has less debt than FLD: MITA (400K) vs FLD (2.03M). FLD (0) and MITA (0) have equivalent revenues.
FLDMITAFLD / MITA
Capitalization152M104M146%
EBITDA-3.73M-1.45M256%
Gain YTD5.2137.88066%
P/E Ratio75.4340.44186%
Revenue00-
Total Cash29.8K0-
Total Debt2.03M400K506%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLDMITA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
30%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MITA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TGRFX8.08-0.01
-0.12%
Transamerica International Focus R6
EGLCX10.33-0.06
-0.58%
Eagle Energy Infrastructure C
AFPAX4.58-0.04
-0.87%
DSS AmericaFirst Income A
HAGAX83.31-0.89
-1.06%
Carillon Eagle Mid Cap Growth A
DMIDX32.96-0.38
-1.14%
BNY Mellon MidCap Index I

FLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLD and FUNTF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLD and FUNTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLD
1D Price
Change %
FLD100%
+0.36%
FUNTF - FLD
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INAQU - FLD
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AFAR - FLD
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WAVSU - FLD
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MITA - FLD
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.21%
More

MITA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MITA has been loosely correlated with BRKH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MITA jumps, then BRKH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MITA
1D Price
Change %
MITA100%
-2.21%
BRKH - MITA
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
PPYA - MITA
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BEAG - MITA
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GBBK - MITA
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BYNO - MITA
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
More