FLG
Price
$12.20
Change
-$0.67 (-5.21%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.56B
59 days until earnings call
MBCN
Price
$24.57
Change
-$0.43 (-1.72%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
192.69M
72 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FLG vs MBCN

Header iconFLG vs MBCN Comparison
Open Charts FLG vs MBCNBanner chart's image
Flagstar Financial
Price$12.20
Change-$0.67 (-5.21%)
Volume$7.66M
Capitalization2.56B
Middlefield Banc
Price$24.57
Change-$0.43 (-1.72%)
Volume$10.52K
Capitalization192.69M
FLG vs MBCN Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBCN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLG vs. MBCN commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLG is a Hold and MBCN is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (FLG: $12.20 vs. MBCN: $24.57)
Brand notoriety: FLG and MBCN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLG: 112% vs. MBCN: 106%
Market capitalization -- FLG: $2.56B vs. MBCN: $192.69M
FLG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.56B. MBCN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $192.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMBCN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FLG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MBCN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBCN is a better buy in the long-term than FLG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBCN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MBCN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBCN is a better buy in the short-term than FLG.

Price Growth

FLG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -7.72% price change this week, while MBCN (@Regional Banks) price change was -8.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLG is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

MBCN is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLG($2.56B) has a higher market cap than MBCN($193M). MBCN has higher P/E ratio than FLG: MBCN (11.34) vs FLG (1.16). FLG YTD gains are higher at: 30.761 vs. MBCN (-12.406). MBCN has less debt than FLG: MBCN (175M) vs FLG (21.3B). FLG has higher revenues than MBCN: FLG (3.63B) vs MBCN (71.9M).
FLGMBCNFLG / MBCN
Capitalization2.56B193M1,327%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD30.761-12.406-248%
P/E Ratio1.1611.3410%
Revenue3.63B71.9M5,053%
Total CashN/A56.2M-
Total Debt21.3B175M12,171%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLG vs MBCN: Fundamental Ratings
FLG
MBCN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3084
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9377
SMR RATING
1..100
949
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3761
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9935
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLG's Valuation (10) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBCN (44) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FLG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBCN’s over the last 12 months.

MBCN's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FLG (93) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MBCN’s stock grew similarly to FLG’s over the last 12 months.

FLG's SMR Rating (9) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBCN (49) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FLG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBCN’s over the last 12 months.

FLG's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as MBCN (61) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FLG’s stock grew similarly to MBCN’s over the last 12 months.

MBCN's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLG (99) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MBCN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLGMBCN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBCN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FOPTX19.86-0.14
-0.70%
Fidelity Advisor Intl Sm Cap Opps M
NQGAX36.33-0.37
-1.01%
Nuveen Global Equity Income A
GSVSX16.24-0.25
-1.52%
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Svc
OLVTX20.20-0.43
-2.08%
JPMorgan Large Cap Value R3
BMPIX107.32-2.96
-2.68%
ProFunds Materials UltraSector Inv

FLG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLG has been loosely correlated with SBNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLG jumps, then SBNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLG
1D Price
Change %
FLG100%
-5.21%
SBNY - FLG
63%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CMTDF - FLG
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MBCN - FLG
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.72%
FBIZ - FLG
33%
Poorly correlated
-2.53%
MNSB - FLG
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.46%
More

MBCN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBCN has been loosely correlated with PPBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBCN jumps, then PPBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBCN
1D Price
Change %
MBCN100%
-1.72%
PPBI - MBCN
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.70%
SBCF - MBCN
62%
Loosely correlated
-3.33%
BFC - MBCN
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
CNOB - MBCN
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.63%
FDBC - MBCN
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
More