FLG
Price
$11.17
Change
+$0.21 (+1.92%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.56B
17 days until earnings call
WAFDP
Price
$15.83
Change
+$0.07 (+0.44%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLG vs WAFDP

Header iconFLG vs WAFDP Comparison
Open Charts FLG vs WAFDPBanner chart's image
Flagstar Financial
Price$11.17
Change+$0.21 (+1.92%)
Volume$4.28M
Capitalization2.56B
WaFd
Price$15.83
Change+$0.07 (+0.44%)
Volume$4.13K
CapitalizationN/A
FLG vs WAFDP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WAFDP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLG vs. WAFDP commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLG is a Hold and WAFDP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FLG: $11.17 vs. WAFDP: $15.83)
Brand notoriety: FLG and WAFDP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLG: 67% vs. WAFDP: 15%
Market capitalization -- FLG: $2.56B vs. WAFDP: $0
FLG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.56B. WAFDP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWAFDP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WAFDP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLG is a better buy in the long-term than WAFDP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WAFDP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WAFDP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FLG and WAFDP are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FLG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.55% price change this week, while WAFDP (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLG is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLG YTD gains are higher at: 19.928 vs. WAFDP (-1.926). WAFDP has less debt than FLG: WAFDP (3.88B) vs FLG (21.3B). FLG has higher revenues than WAFDP: FLG (3.63B) vs WAFDP (714M).
FLGWAFDPFLG / WAFDP
Capitalization2.56BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD19.928-1.926-1,035%
P/E Ratio1.16N/A-
Revenue3.63B714M509%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt21.3B3.88B550%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLG: Fundamental Ratings
FLG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
10
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLGWAFDP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WAFDP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PMPIX86.390.81
+0.95%
ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Inv
COFRX39.210.34
+0.87%
Columbia Contrarian Core Inst2
IJPIX14.760.08
+0.54%
VY® JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity S
JIJAX14.880.07
+0.47%
JHancock International Dynamic Gr A
KDHCX53.59-0.11
-0.20%
DWS CROCI Equity Dividend C

FLG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLG has been loosely correlated with SBNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLG jumps, then SBNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLG
1D Price
Change %
FLG100%
+1.92%
SBNY - FLG
63%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TECTP - FLG
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OZKAP - FLG
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
VLYPP - FLG
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
WAFDP - FLG
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
More

WAFDP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WAFDP has been loosely correlated with HBANP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WAFDP jumps, then HBANP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WAFDP
1D Price
Change %
WAFDP100%
+1.02%
HBANP - WAFDP
48%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BMRC - WAFDP
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
OZKAP - WAFDP
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
HBANL - WAFDP
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
PLBC - WAFDP
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
More