Advertisement
FLGT vs GOOG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLGT is a Buy and GOOG is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLGT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGOOG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- FLGT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- GOOG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLGT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GOOG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FLGT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- GOOG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
FLGT (@Medical Specialties) experienced а +3.60% price change this week, while GOOG (@Internet Software/Services) price change was -2.30% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.30%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was +0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.32%.
Reported Earning Dates
FLGT is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.
GOOG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical Specialties (+0.78% weekly)Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.
@Internet Software/Services (+0.70% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
| FLGT | GOOG | FLGT / GOOG | |
| Capitalization | 649M | 1.94T | 0% |
| EBITDA | -49.15M | 98B | -0% |
| Gain YTD | 15.268 | -10.952 | -139% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.33 | 26.98 | 27% |
| Revenue | 289M | 307B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 424M | 111B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 15.3M | 28.5B | 0% |
FLGT | GOOG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 95 | 26 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 28 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | 85 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 45 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GOOG's Valuation (21) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as FLGT (53) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that GOOG’s stock grew similarly to FLGT’s over the last 12 months.
GOOG's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLGT (95) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that GOOG’s stock grew significantly faster than FLGT’s over the last 12 months.
GOOG's SMR Rating (28) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLGT (90) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that GOOG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLGT’s over the last 12 months.
FLGT's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as GOOG (57) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that FLGT’s stock grew similarly to GOOG’s over the last 12 months.
FLGT's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for GOOG (85) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that FLGT’s stock grew significantly faster than GOOG’s over the last 12 months.
| FLGT | GOOG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 47% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 15 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 64% |
Advertisement
FLGT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLGT has been loosely correlated with BLFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLGT jumps, then BLFS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLGT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLGT | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| BLFS - FLGT | 41% Loosely correlated | +3.04% | ||
| NEO - FLGT | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| CERS - FLGT | 38% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| RGEN - FLGT | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| QTRX - FLGT | 38% Loosely correlated | +2.86% | ||
More | ||||