FLMMF vs SLVDF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLMMF is a StrongSell and SLVDF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLMMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLVDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FLMMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SLVDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLMMF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- FLMMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FLMMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +0.02% price change this week, while SLVDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +11.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.54%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.77% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| FLMMF | SLVDF | FLMMF / SLVDF | |
| Capitalization | 2.45B | 10.3M | 23,767% |
| EBITDA | -91.17M | -483.58K | 18,854% |
| Gain YTD | 49.214 | 57.926 | 85% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 58.7M | 5.29M | 1,110% |
| Total Debt | 2.51K | N/A | - |
| FLMMF | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A |
FLMMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLMMF has been loosely correlated with HBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLMMF jumps, then HBM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLMMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLMMF | 100% | -0.27% | ||
| HBM - FLMMF | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| CSCCF - FLMMF | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.96% | ||
| LUNMF - FLMMF | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.19% | ||
| FCX - FLMMF | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| ERO - FLMMF | 47% Loosely correlated | -3.19% | ||
More | ||||
SLVDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SLVDF and PGEZF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLVDF and PGEZF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLVDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLVDF | 100% | +10.52% | ||
| PGEZF - SLVDF | 27% Poorly correlated | +4.65% | ||
| LUNMF - SLVDF | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.19% | ||
| FLMMF - SLVDF | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.27% | ||
| AAGFF - SLVDF | 25% Poorly correlated | -3.45% | ||
| TGB - SLVDF | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.66% | ||
More | ||||