FLO
Price
$22.18
Change
-$0.08 (-0.36%)
Updated
Sep 29, 6:59 PM EST
39 days until earnings call
LW
Price
$92.47
Change
+$0.31 (+0.34%)
Updated
Sep 29, 6:59 PM EST
4 days until earnings call

Analysis and predictions FLO vs LW

Header iconFLO vs LW Comparison
Open Charts FLO vs LWBanner chart's image
Flowers Foods
Price$22.18
Change-$0.08 (-0.36%)
Volume$279.25K
CapitalizationN/A
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$92.47
Change+$0.31 (+0.34%)
Volume$888.87K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FLO vs LW Comparison Chart

Loading...

Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
VS
FLO vs. LW commentary
Oct 01, 2023

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLO is a StrongSell and LW is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 01, 2023
Stock price -- (FLO: $22.18 vs. LW: $92.46)
Brand notoriety: FLO and LW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLO: 67% vs. LW: 146%
Market capitalization -- FLO: $4.7B vs. LW: $13.44B
FLO [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $4.7B. LW’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $13.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $7.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the long-term than FLO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the short-term than FLO.

Price Growth

FLO (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -3.23% price change this week, while LW (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -1.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLO is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2023.

LW is expected to report earnings on Jan 04, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-1.76% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for FLO with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for LW with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LW($13.4B) has a higher market cap than FLO($4.7B). FLO has higher P/E ratio than LW: FLO (21.19) vs LW (13.26). LW YTD gains are higher at: 4.307 vs. FLO (-20.709). LW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.11B vs. FLO (470M). FLO has less debt than LW: FLO (1.37B) vs LW (3.49B). LW has higher revenues than FLO: LW (5.35B) vs FLO (5B).
FLOLWFLO / LW
Capitalization4.7B13.4B35%
EBITDA470M1.11B43%
Gain YTD-20.7094.307-481%
P/E Ratio21.1913.26160%
Revenue5B5.35B93%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.37B3.49B39%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLO vs LW: Fundamental Ratings
FLO
LW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7271
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3440
SMR RATING
1..100
5513
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7660
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7297
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a33

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLO's Valuation (17) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as LW (46). This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as LW (40). This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's SMR Rating (13) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLO (55). This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLO’s over the last 12 months.

LW's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as FLO (76). This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as LW (97). This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLOLW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QTWO32.270.32
+1.00%
Q2 Holdings
LIFE1.59N/A
N/A
aTyr Pharma
SCNI0.87N/A
N/A
Scinai Immunotherapeutics Ltd
JNPR27.79-0.05
-0.18%
Juniper Networks
CMPS7.39-0.10
-1.34%
COMPASS Pathways Plc

FLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLO has been loosely correlated with POST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLO jumps, then POST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLO
1D Price
Change %
FLO100%
-0.36%
POST - FLO
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
KHC - FLO
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
K - FLO
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
CAG - FLO
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
GIS - FLO
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
More

LW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LW has been loosely correlated with CAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LW jumps, then CAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LW
1D Price
Change %
LW100%
+0.29%
CAG - LW
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
POST - LW
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
HSY - LW
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
CPB - LW
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
K - LW
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
More