FLO
Price
$8.29
Change
-$0.05 (-0.60%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.76B
23 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMPL
Price
$13.31
Change
+$0.54 (+4.23%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.18B
100 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLO vs SMPL

FLO vs SMPL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLO vs. SMPL commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLO is a Hold and SMPL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (FLO: $8.29 vs. SMPL: $13.31)
Brand notoriety: FLO and SMPL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLO: 45% vs. SMPL: 64%
Market capitalization -- FLO: $1.76B vs. SMPL: $1.18B
FLO [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $1.76B. SMPL’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $1.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $255.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $3.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSMPL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FLO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SMPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLO is a better buy in the long-term than SMPL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMPL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SMPL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SMPL is a better buy in the short-term than FLO.

Price Growth

FLO (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -3.72% price change this week, while SMPL (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +2.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -1.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLO is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

SMPL is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-1.71% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLO($1.76B) has a higher market cap than SMPL($1.18B). FLO has higher P/E ratio than SMPL: FLO (23.69) vs SMPL (16.03). FLO YTD gains are higher at: -20.431 vs. SMPL (-33.715). FLO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 356M vs. SMPL (-204.38M). SMPL has less debt than FLO: SMPL (440M) vs FLO (2.05B). FLO has higher revenues than SMPL: FLO (5.27B) vs SMPL (1.39B).
FLOSMPLFLO / SMPL
Capitalization1.76B1.18B149%
EBITDA356M-204.38M-174%
Gain YTD-20.431-33.71561%
P/E Ratio23.6916.03148%
Revenue5.27B1.39B379%
Total CashN/A124M-
Total Debt2.05B440M466%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLO vs SMPL: Fundamental Ratings
FLO
SMPL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7729
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8595
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5962
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1483
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLO's Valuation (3) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMPL (61) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMPL’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SMPL (100) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to SMPL’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's SMR Rating (85) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SMPL (95) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to SMPL’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SMPL (62) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to SMPL’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for SMPL (83) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew significantly faster than SMPL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLOSMPL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMPL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSFX16.020.47
+3.02%
T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF
AMZY10.870.09
+0.83%
YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF
EPEM29.11N/A
N/A
Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
SPCT27.65N/A
N/A
Liberty One Spectrum ETF
SUSB24.85N/A
N/A
iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corp Bd ETF

FLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLO has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLO jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLO
1D Price
Change %
FLO100%
-0.60%
GIS - FLO
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
CAG - FLO
53%
Loosely correlated
+3.62%
MDLZ - FLO
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
CPB - FLO
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
TR - FLO
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
More

SMPL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMPL has been loosely correlated with TR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMPL jumps, then TR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMPL
1D Price
Change %
SMPL100%
+4.23%
TR - SMPL
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
FLO - SMPL
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
MDLZ - SMPL
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
SJM - SMPL
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
HSY - SMPL
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
More