Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLQL vs RECS
FLQL vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts FLQL vs RECS
Franklin US Large Cap Mltfctr Idx ETF
Price$61.18
Change+$0.54 (+0.89%)
Volume$44.27K
Net Assets1.47B
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$35.56
Change+$0.40 (+1.14%)
Volume$281.26K
Net Assets2.79B
FLQL vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLQL vs. RECS commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLQL is a Buy and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.79B vs. FLQL (1.47B). FLQL has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: FLQL (4.575) vs RECS (2.715). FLQL was incepted earlier than RECS: FLQL (8 years) vs RECS (6 years). FLQL (0.15) and RECS (0.15) have comparable expense ratios . FLQL has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| FLQL | RECS | FLQL / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 4.575 | 2.715 | 169% |
| Net Assets | 1.47B | 2.79B | 53% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.15 | 100% |
| Turnover | 56.10 | 49.00 | 114% |
| Yield | 1.15 | 0.69 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLQL | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 17 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FLQL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLQL has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLQL jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLQL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLQL | 100% | +0.89% | ||
| JHG - FLQL | 80% Closely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| GS - FLQL | 77% Closely correlated | +1.34% | ||
| MS - FLQL | 76% Closely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| JEF - FLQL | 75% Closely correlated | +2.72% | ||
| EQH - FLQL | 75% Closely correlated | +2.24% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +1.14% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +2.72% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +1.60% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.71% | ||
More | ||||