Ad is loading...
FLQL vs RECS
FLQL vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts FLQL vs RECS
Franklin US Large Cap Mltfctr Idx ETF
Price$61.03
Change+$0.36 (+0.59%)
Volume$71.41K
Net Assets1.53B
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$35.80
Change-$0.05 (-0.14%)
Volume$600
Net Assets1.74B
FLQL vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLQL vs. RECS commentary
Jan 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLQL is a StrongBuy and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 1.74B vs. FLQL (1.53B). FLQL has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: FLQL (4.076) vs RECS (3.524). FLQL was incepted earlier than RECS: FLQL (8 years) vs RECS (5 years). FLQL has a higher turnover RECS (45.00) vs RECS (45.00).
| FLQL | RECS | FLQL / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 4.076 | 3.524 | 116% |
| Net Assets | 1.53B | 1.74B | 88% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 51.95 | 45.00 | 115% |
| Yield | 1.28 | 0.89 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLQL | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 90% | 16 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 73% | 16 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 88% | 16 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 74% | 16 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 86% | 18 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 74% | 24 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 83% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FLQL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLQL has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLQL jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLQL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLQL | 100% | +0.59% | ||
| LRCX - FLQL | 74% Closely correlated | +2.15% | ||
| SNPS - FLQL | 72% Closely correlated | +2.82% | ||
| CDNS - FLQL | 72% Closely correlated | +3.38% | ||
| KLAC - FLQL | 71% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| AMAT - FLQL | 71% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.56% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +1.86% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +3.38% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +4.13% | ||
| JHG - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| LRCX - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.15% | ||
More | ||||