Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLRGX vs RBFTX
FLRGX vs RBFTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLRGX vs. RBFTX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLRGX is a StrongBuy and RBFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBFTX has more cash in the bank: 50.5B vs. FLRGX (147M). FLRGX pays higher dividends than RBFTX: FLRGX (1.76) vs RBFTX (0.94). FLRGX was incepted earlier than RBFTX: FLRGX (19 years) vs RBFTX (18 years). RBFTX (1.43) is less costly to investors than FLRGX (1.25). FLRGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.89 vs. RBFTX (7.00). RBFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLRGX: RBFTX (250) vs FLRGX (1000). FLRGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.21 vs. RBFTX (7.60). RBFTX return over 5 years is better than : 33.84 vs. FLRGX (24.26).
| FLRGX | RBFTX | FLRGX / RBFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.43 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.43 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.354 | 5.809 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 147M | 50.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 0.94 | 187% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.21 | 7.60 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.98 | 29.49 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.26 | 33.84 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.69 | 53.00 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers