Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLRGX vs RHFTX
FLRGX vs RHFTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLRGX vs. RHFTX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLRGX is a StrongBuy and RHFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHFTX has more cash in the bank: 50.5B vs. FLRGX (147M). RHFTX (1.78) and FLRGX (1.76) have matching dividends . FLRGX was incepted earlier than RHFTX: FLRGX (19 years) vs RHFTX (10 years). FLRGX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RHFTX (0.48). FLRGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.89 vs. RHFTX (7.00). RHFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLRGX: RHFTX (250) vs FLRGX (1000). FLRGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.21 vs. RHFTX (8.62). RHFTX return over 5 years is better than : 38.84 vs. FLRGX (24.26).
| FLRGX | RHFTX | FLRGX / RHFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.48 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.48 | 260% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.354 | 6.197 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 147M | 50.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 1.78 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.21 | 8.62 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.98 | 32.44 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.26 | 38.84 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement