Ad is loading...
FMACX vs RGEBX
FMACX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FMACX vs RGEBX
American Funds AMCAP F3
Price$41.74
Change-$0.11 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.6B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$69.50
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.48B
FMACX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMACX vs. RGEBX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMACX is a Buy and RGEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FMACX (84.6B). FMACX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FMACX (0.64) vs RGEBX (0.00). FMACX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FMACX (8 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FMACX (0.34). FMACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMACX: RGEBX (250) vs FMACX (1000000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.37 vs. FMACX (0.26). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 40.57 vs. FMACX (32.97).
| FMACX | RGEBX | FMACX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.09 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.09 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.133 | -2.716 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 84.6B | 285B | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.26 | 2.37 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.96 | 30.92 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.97 | 40.57 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.82 | - |