Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMAIX vs NBMAX
FMAIX vs NBMAX Comparison
Open Charts FMAIX vs NBMAX
Franklin MA Tax-Free Income C
Price$10.28
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.74M
Nuveen MA Municipal Bond I
Price$8.90
Change-$0.02 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets384.33M
FMAIX vs NBMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMAIX vs. NBMAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMAIX is a Hold and NBMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBMAX has more cash in the bank: 384M vs. FMAIX (333M). NBMAX pays higher dividends than FMAIX: NBMAX (3.54) vs FMAIX (2.43). FMAIX was incepted earlier than NBMAX: FMAIX (30 years) vs NBMAX (38 years). FMAIX (1.28) is less costly to investors than NBMAX (0.59). NBMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. FMAIX (25.42). FMAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBMAX: FMAIX (1000) vs NBMAX (100000). NBMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.53 vs. FMAIX (-1.26). NBMAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.32 vs. FMAIX (-8.19).
| FMAIX | NBMAX | FMAIX / NBMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.59 | 217% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.59 | 217% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.398 | -2.246 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 333M | 384M | 87% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.43 | 3.54 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.26 | -0.53 | 240% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.02 | 2.39 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.19 | -0.32 | 2,590% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.28 | 9.37 | -46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement